Update: apparently liberty's most steadfast and ardent defender, Andrew Sullivan, is in agreement with his bosom buddy Josh Marshall about Palin's flubbing of the Bush doctrine question. Who knows, maybe she's secretly part of that dread fifth column.
Update: Apparently I'm not the only one who thinks there's a good deal of ambiguity surrounding the term "Bush Doctrine." While Josh Marshall apparently thinks this is ridiculous, the more I read the more I'm convinced that Palin was in the right for asking Gibson for clarification on what he meant, and Gibson was being needlessly coy when he refused to elaborate on what he was referring to. Granted, it was foolish and belied a lack of confidence for Palin not to have followed up with something like, "Well Charlie, I'm assuming you're referring to the doctrine of preventative warfare. . . " If anything, Palin demonstrated she lacks the confidence to discuss foreign policy, a sin in and of itself when running for VP, but she it can't fairly be said or implied that based on Palin's evident lack of understanding of the term Bush Doctrine that she was completely unfamiliar with the policy set forth in the National Security Strategy document. Weirdly, despite Marshall's and Sullivan's disingenuous claims to the contrary, I think Krauthammer makes the most sense when he attributes the gaffe to Gibson.
No comments:
Post a Comment